tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4216862327208974261.post6578468390675850213..comments2024-03-28T00:57:37.761+11:00Comments on Amy S. Talks Cricket: AP: 1, Lalit Modi: 0Amyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10861185876518162341noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4216862327208974261.post-85908804098841796782009-04-10T16:42:00.000+10:002009-04-10T16:42:00.000+10:00Well, I'm sure this issue has two sides to it, but...Well, I'm sure this issue has two sides to it, but I believe the case of the media stands out. The IPL wanted to restrict news and photos access to one website. AP, Reuters and co. had it right when they said that the IPL needs their coverage, not the other way around. <BR/><BR/>The AP has an extensive range of websites that use the information it gathers to list news and events in the cricketing world. If the IPL had refused them that then it would really just be pointless for them to be covering the IPL anyway.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10861185876518162341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4216862327208974261.post-6318004577938195802009-04-10T15:48:00.000+10:002009-04-10T15:48:00.000+10:00Amy,A question. Are the news agencies right in ref...Amy,<BR/><BR/>A question. Are the news agencies right in refusing to pay IPL?<BR/><BR/>By threatening to boycott aren't they indulging in blackmail?Viswanathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03511419586643916500noreply@blogger.com